Health Principles Reflection and Benefits Of Reducing The Diseases

Question: Discuss about the Public Health Principles Reflection and Benefits Of Reducing The Diseases Prevalence. Answer: Reflection The health care system in Australia is multifaceted and complex in natures. The health care systems and application s of the health policy on the population play role in health care practice. Management of health care practice is crucial in delivering of access to health to the population .both health financing and distribution of health care services is the duty of the state. However in rolling out these health care services, guidelines must be followed to ensure that key access to the people is achieved. The focus of intervention in public health are prevent and mange diseases, injuries and emerging medical conditions. It is usually done based on the promotion of healthy behaviors in the community and the surrounding environment that we live in. public health initiatives such as such as immunization and vaccinations programs have placed a key role in ensuring the health of the overall population at large. Such measures have increased the life expectancy of the populations. Diseases prevention in public health has yielded significant efforts in both developing and the developed countries. To achieve this local health systems and efforts of nongovernmental organizations have played a key role in the implementation of these programs. The WHO, role in health care is playing a critical role in enduring the health of the population is achieved. Most governments around the globe have recognized the importance of public health programs in minimizing the incidence and the prevalence of diseases worldwide. Public health initiatives have shown to provide improvement in public health thought initiatives like eradication of the diseases like small pox. The functions of public health programs according to the world heath organizations are that, they provide leadership on critical matters pertaining health care and they engage the different level of partnerships in ensuring the access to health care is achieved., it has shaped the research agenda of the different populations through eh stimulation of and transfer of critical information in the health care practice. Public health program heave shaped the research agenda of the populations through setting norms and standard bench marks for the implementation s and promotion of health care services. Public health approach is that it should be population based and insist on the collective responsibility of health in the protection and preventing diseases. It further emphasizes the role of the sate in public health practice. The key domains for public health practice are that it improves on the health care practice of the health of the people. Improvement of the health services of the peo ple are that they improve on the clinical functionality, efficiency and service planning for the population. In informing health care practice, there is need to provide a rational for protection for the health of the people through prevention of infectious diseases, chemicals and managing environmental hazards facing the people. Investing in the health of the people is much significant in improving their overall health, however we often ask ourselves the question how much worth investing should be done. In ensuring effective health promotion and prevention of diseases, investments are needed to be given priority. The monetary benefits of investment however are a measure of how healthy the population is at a given time. Quantifying health outcomes of the population has been the challenging task of modern day society. The regard that quality of life can be measured from good health it is associated; they value it as valuable outcome beyond measure. The estimates of health care in relation to the health status and the financial benefits have been advanced in the modern day society. In justifying in terms of investment it aims at reducing the prevalence of health factors towards the achievement of good health. Currently the current research and focus has now shifted to the greater investment in the health care s ervices. The rich wealth of information on health care practice is aimed at achieving health information that enable us to make informed decisions on policy priority set ups and funding priorities in the health care arena. Programs which implement prevention care has found out those small investments are needed to achieve effective health care protection unlike providing treatment services to the people already affected by the diseases, which in turn are resource intensive. Hence in following the principles of public health, we are able to achieve and reduce the prevalence and incidences of diseases and thus lead to improved quality of life. Priority setting exercise The program has health benefits of reducing the diseases prevalence as the main focus for prevention of diseases occurrence and minimizes hospitalization and diseases exposure. It estimates the health status of people in the region of river land in terms of socio economic status and the financial inputs needed to reduce the prevalence of the risk factors which contribute to the diseases which affect the health status of the community. The application of the health principles for dieases prevention is utilized. The WHO public health principles are also applicable in this program, (Peterson Kwan, 2004). Communities tend to use more health services when a number of chronic and emerging diseases are setting base. This leads to increase cost of health care expenditure and the situation is critical among populations in the lower socio economic status. Reducing prevalence is one way that aims to provide an approach to improve the health of this category of people. The factors which have sh own to affect the quality of health in the region of Riverlands, Australia, have been highlighted from base study conducted, which showed socioeconomic disadvantage affecting the poles health., (Gibney, Cheng Hall Leder, 2017). Spending in health care in this zone is likely to produce 20.6% of prevalence outcome in low socio economic status, hospitalization incidence outcome will be 25.3% and mortality outcomes will be 24.2 %. The socio economic factors affecting the population of River land are diverse and present. From research analysis majority of the population aged 25-64 years are prone to ill health, (Zhang Oldenburg, 2014). With the intervention rolls out it shows that the outcomes of hospitalization will be reduced by 25.3%, still high. The disparities in the health care services and access relate to the status of the population, they contribute to high hospitalization rate. Findings from other studies have that the entire priority setting of the large Australia region, gaps exists on health care access among the least socio economic statues. The socio economic status is linked to this deferential health statistics, (Katterl, 2011). The total budget spending will be $2,042,998,828.68 to effectively run the entire programs outline and be able to achieve the outcomes outlined above. The approach will be based upon five categories. The first being primary prevention targeting mass awareness campaigns for the community. Individual activities under this target are; smocking awareness campaigns, alcohol based campaigns and nutritional and physical campaign activities .The total budget spending for these is $336,655,173. For the second approach will be targeting education campaigns which entail, smoking reduction programs, drinking awareness campaigns, sugar consumption and overweight /obesity campaigns and psychological distress awareness campaigns for the community. The estimated budget for these activities is $ 265,600,756 The overall outcome of the socioeconomic approach is to reduce the disease prevalence in the population of River land. Diseases management approaches have now become popular approaches worldwide, (Diets et al., 2015). For the reduction of diseases prevalence to be effective, the target population was reviewed and their demographic characteristics taken and the individual expenditure calculated so as to get the actual per person spending on prevention program. Positive health outcome is achieved through investment on health care services, increasing expenditure on health allocation and patient satisfaction must be achieved. Prevention programs in health care have been developed and implemented through health care plans. Many programs are now utilizing the multi approach, (Eldredge et al., 2016). The target population is practicing smoking as per study done. Persons aged 25-64 are more likely to drink alcohols hence the focus of the study is target campaign against alcohol consumption and smoking. The health program has been implemented comprehensively to balance the health resources that are available with the health needs of the population. The program has followed WHO public health approach steps. First assessment is the identification of problems which were conducted and the program formulated by the program through the socio economic status of the River land region. The program has identified risk factors associated which are alcohol, smoke, the respiratory diseases and development of interventions which the interventions have been targeted by the program and the implementation of the interventions. The interventions are effective and promising to have a positive change in the set up region. From the assessments the interventions are likely have a positive impact on the population of the river land. References Dietz, W. H., Baur, L. A., Hall, K., Puhl, R. M., Taveras, E. M., Uauy, R., Kopelman, P. (2015). Management of obesity: improvement of health-care training and systems for prevention and care. The Lancet, 385(9986), 2521-2533. Eldredge, L. K. B., Markham, C. M., Kok, G., Ruiter, R. A., Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. John Wiley Sons. Gibney, K. B., Cheng, A. C., Hall, R., Leder, K. (2017). Sociodemographic and geographical inequalities in notifiable infectious diseases in Australia: a retrospective analysis of 21 years of national disease surveillance data. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 86-97. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30309-7 Katterl R. (2011). Socioeconomic status and accessibility to health care services in Australia. RESEARCH ROUNDup Issue 22. Adelaide: Primary Health Care Research Information Service. Petersen, P. E., Kwan, S. (2004). Evaluation of community-based oral health promotion and oral disease prevention-WHO recommendations for improved evidence in public health practice. Community dental health, 21(4), 319-329. Zhang, J., Oldenburg, B. F. (2014). Socioeconomic inequalities in utilisation of preventive health services in relation to cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Journal of Behavioral Health, 3(2), 87-94.